Pages: 1 ... 20 21 [22] 23 24 ... 36

The launch of the Radeon HD 5000 series has been a noticeably different than other major GPU launches in the last half-decade. Process problems over at TSMC and a lack of a competitive card from NVIDIA has resulted in a level of demand that until this year could not be satiated. Cypress chips were going out the door to stores practically as fast as they came out of the fab, leaving card vendors with too few chips to do custom card lines. What we have seen up until now has been limited to reference cards, with only minor variations such as a different cooler or a BIOS that allows voltage control. The supply of Cypress chips has only finally reached the point where there’s a suitable number of them for card vendors to produce a custom design.

Today Sapphire is launching a pair of Radeon HD 5850 cards: the 5850 Vapor-X and the 5850 Toxic Edition. Both of these cards use a new custom design – a custom PCB, custom chokes, and of course a custom cooler – making the set of them the first custom 5850 on the market. Both are factory overclocked, with the Vapor-X clocking in at 735MHz/1050MHz, and the Toxic at 765MHz/1125MHz, and are otherwise identical. Sapphire tells us that only the Toxic will be launching in North America, while the Vapor-X will be available elsewhere. As such, today we were looking at their 5850 Toxic Edition.

Read more...

0 Comments

Today we will talk about a graphics accelerator based on the junior graphics processor from ATI Radeon HD 5xxx family – "Redwood".

Read more...

0 Comments

When AMD launched the 5670, they told us they had 2 more cards on the way: the 5450, and a 5500 series card. Last week we saw the launch of the 5450, utilizing the Cedar GPU and finishing off AMD’s chip stack. Today we’re looking at that 5500 series card, the Radeon HD 5570.

Read more...

0 Comments
<p><span style="font-size: small;"><span class="content">4 chips in 6 months reaches its end today, with the launch of the final chip in AMD&rsquo;s Evergreen stack: Cedar. Cedar, the baby of the family, will be powering AMD&rsquo;s bottom-tier cards. Today we&rsquo;re seeing the &nbsp;the first of what we expect will be a couple of Cedar cards with the launch of the Radeon 5450.</span></span></p> <p><span style="font-size: small;"><a target="_blank" href="http://www.anandtech.com/video/showdoc.aspx?i=3734">Read more...</a><br /> </span></p>

0 Comments
<p><span style="font-size: small;">As a rule, discrete multi-GPU systems are symmetrical, but today we are going to talk about an asymmetrical ATI CrossFireX tandem that may become a good option in case of two-step upgrade for your gaming platform and even become an alternative to a Radeon HD 5870.</span><span style="font-size: small;"><br /> </span></p> <p><span style="font-size: small;"><a target="_blank" href="http://www.xbitlabs.com/articles/video/display/asus_eah5770-powercolor_pcs_hd5750.html">Read more...</a><br /> </span></p>

0 Comments
<p><span class="content"> </span></p> <p><span style="font-size: small">At this year&rsquo;s Consumer Electronics Show, NVIDIA had several things going on. In a public press conference they announced 3D Vision Surround and Tegra 2, while on the showfloor they had products o&rsquo;plenty, including a GF100 setup showcasing 3D Vision Surround.</span></p> <p><span style="font-size: small">But if you&rsquo;re here, then what you&rsquo;re most interested is in what wasn&rsquo;t talked about in public, and that was GF100. With the Fermi-based GF100 GPU finally in full production, NVIDIA was ready to talk to the press about the rest of GF100, and at the tail-end of CES we got our first look at GF100&rsquo;s gaming abilities, along with a hands-on look at some unknown GF100 products in action. The message NVIDIA was trying to send: GF100 is going to be here soon, and it&rsquo;s going to be fast.</span></p> <p><span style="font-size: small">With that said, while NVIDIA is showing of GF100, they aren&rsquo;t showing off the final products. As such we can talk about the GPU, but we don&rsquo;t know anything about the final cards. All of that will be announced at a later time &ndash; and no, we don&rsquo;t know <em>that</em> either.</span></p> <p><span style="font-size: small"><a target="_blank" href="http://www.anandtech.com/video/showdoc.aspx?i=3721">Read more...</a></span></p>

0 Comments
<p><span style="font-size: small">After a holiday break, AMD&rsquo;s staggered launch of the Evergreen family picks back up today with the launch of the Radeon HD 5670. The 5670 marks the desktop launch of Redwood, the 3<sup>rd</sup> chip in the Evergreen family, designed to fit in below the Juniper chip that powers the Radeon HD 5700 series.</span></p> <p><span style="font-size: small"><a href="http://www.anandtech.com/video/showdoc.aspx?i=3720">Read more...</a></span></p>

0 Comments
<p><span style="font-size: small;"><span class="content">Late last year NVIDIA launched the 2<sup>nd</sup> of their 40nm parts, the GT 240. Based upon the GT215 core, the GT 240 is functionally a derivative of the low-end GT 220. Compared to the GT 220 it packs twice as many shader units, twice as many texture units, and support for GDDR5, making it a good deal faster than the GT 220. As a GT 220 derivative, this also means it comes with DirectX 10.1 support and &nbsp;the VP4 video decode engine. </span></span><span class="content"> </span></p> <p><span style="font-size: small;">NVIDIA&rsquo;s latest efforts at lowering idle power usage can be seen here, with a 9W idle power usage (only 2W more than the GT 220) while load power is specified as 70W &ndash; 70W likely being chosen to avoid the need for a PCIe power connector. The transistor cost of these extra functional units means that the GT 240 comes in at an estimated 727M transistors, occupying a die area we measure at 144mm2.</span></p> <p><span style="font-size: small;">Unfortunately, not everything got the same boost as compared to the GT 220. Specifically the number of ROPs remains the same at 8, and worse yet the core clock speed is only 550MHz on the GT 240, versus 625MHz (or more) on the GT 220. So not only did the GT 240 not get more rasterizing power to go with its other enhanced abilities, but in fact it&rsquo;s ever-so-slightly slower than the GT 220 when it comes to rasterizing. For the sake of comparison this is also half as many ROPs as on the 9600GT and 9800GT, both of which are also clocked higher.</span></p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p><a href="http://www.anandtech.com/video/showdoc.aspx?i=3709"><span style="font-size: small;">Read more... </span></a></p>

0 Comments

Unable to withstand the massive invasion of AMD/ATI solution sin high-performance segments, Nvidia has turned its efforts to the budget market. Today we are going to talk about another addition to the 40 nm graphics processor family from this company.

Read more...

0 Comments

Can a pair of budget graphics cards compete against a single Hi-End solution and what are the pros and cons of configurations like that – all these answers in our today’s article !

Read more...

0 Comments
Pages: 1 ... 20 21 [22] 23 24 ... 36